At a time when firms are automating and digitalising processes at a hyper-accelerated rate, a surprising number of firms still perform the reconciliation process manually using spreadsheets. Cloud-based platforms are now enabling more and more firms to automate an effort that’s often lengthy, tedious, and prone to human error, but how does automation make a difference?
The reconciliation process can be automated by using specialised software and tools that are designed to streamline the entire process. These tools can automatically match data from multiple sources, identify discrepancies, and flag any errors or discrepancies for further review. Automated reconciliation processes can also incorporate machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms to further improve accuracy and speed. The integration of these technologies ensures a faster and more accurate reconciliation process that helps organisations to save time and money while minimising the risk of errors and fraudulent activities.
A list of ways automation can help the reconciliation process:
Efficiency: Automation can help speed up the reconciliation process by reducing the need for manual intervention. This can help organisations meet reporting deadlines more quickly and reduce the risk of errors.
Accuracy: Automated reporting tools can use intelligent algorithms to identify errors, inconsistencies, and potential compliance issues, allowing regulatory reports to be more accurate and reliable.
Consistency: Automation tools can help ensure that data is consistent across multiple reports, reducing the risk of errors and allowing organisations to maintain compliance with regulatory requirements.
Scalability: Automation tools can help organisations handle larger volumes of data without increasing the burden on staff. This is especially useful when dealing with complex regulatory requirements or large datasets.
Overall, automation can help reduce the time and effort required for the reconciliation process while improving the quality and accuracy of reports. This can help organisations avoid costly fines and reputational damage resulting from non-compliance.
Understanding the different approaches between the buy-side and sell-side can help heads of operations, on either side, make informed decisions when it comes to managing risk.
Managing risk and ensuring compliance can be complex and challenging. To navigate these challenges it’s essential to have a clear strategy in place.
Sign up using the option below to receive the latest articles sent straight to your inbox.
